Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 30.06.2025 07:59

What’s next?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Diddy trial day 21 recap: 3rd victim takes the stand as judge threatens to boot Combs - ABC News
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Astronomers Astonished by Largest Explosion Since the Big Bang - futurism.com
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Thank you.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
These Diabetes Drugs Are Finding New Life as an Antiaging Hack - WSJ
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
A chemical in acne medicine can help regenerate limbs - Yahoo
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
What AI tool can be used to write exactly in the human writing style?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.